Advocacy Tools: A Double-Edged Sword?
Monday, March 24th, 2008 by Matthew DeGrootTeresa’s Making Do With What You’ve Got entry raised an interesting question, one that’s been nagging me for a long time: how do advocacy proponents and advocacy trainers approach the issue of who is benefitting from their work, and what those beneficiaries are advocating for?
I used to work at an umbrella organization that assisted NGOs interested in gaining access to events and committee meetings at the United Nations. My group was issue neutral — we supported the right of all NGOs, regardless of mission or orientation, to have access to the proceedings of the UN and have their say on issues before decision-making bodies. One of our member organizations happened to be the National Rifle Association, a group whose mission I happen to disagree with. But it was my job, as much as it was in my power to do so, to make sure that they had access to key delegations and committees at the United Nations — the better to persuade UN representatives that the right to own guns was important and should be safeguarded at the international level.